Back to Home

About Artist

At Fine Art Masterpieces by Amirani, we are dedicated to the exploration and celebration of contemporary art that transcends traditional boundaries. Founded in 2025 in Tbilisi, by Nikoloz Ichkitidze (Family member, soninlow of Amirani Parkosadze ), our site offers an exlusively and meticulously curated selection of artworks of Amirani Parkosadze that blend abstraction and figuration. We recognize that art is not merely an aesthetic addition to a space; it is a profound means of communication that invites interpretation and engagement. Our collection features unique pieces only from Amirani Parkosadze which exemplifies dynamic movement and emotional depth. Each artwork is selected based on its ability to challenge conventions and provoke thought, appealing to collectors who seek more than just decoration. we think that contemporary art can enhance cognitive engagement and emotional well-being, making our offerings not only visually striking but also intellectually stimulating.

Born on February 25, 1941, in Georgia, Amiran Parkosadze is an artist who represents a living link with modernist traditions while at the same time revealing his own unmistakable style. His works show technical mastery and emotional depth, especially in the depiction of human figures and social scenes.

oil painings in Amirani's Studio

 

We do not even know how proud he must be, but the fact is the fact, and one couldn't retreat from it: Amiran Parkosadze became a member of the Union of Artists of the Soviet Union back in 1972. 



Union of Artists of the Soviet Union Union of Artists of the Soviet Union

 

 

When he begins to tell about the very start of his professional activity, the first thing striking is something grand, far exceeding the limits of any title and recognition. The membership of Amiran Parkosadze in the Union of Artists of the USSR in 1972 was not an achievement but a milestone event that over time came to express his unstoppable seeking of self-expression. It was the culmination of years spent perfecting his craft, pushing the boundaries of his abilities, and enduring the countless challenges that came with being an artist in a system that ordained the course which creative expression was to take.

Yes, he, as an artist, reached his goal and became a member of the Union of Artists of the USSR in 1972 --at that time when his endless years of struggle and sleepless nights with work just to fulfill his commitment were getting their consolation. Yet with all that, he remains the same-poor, almost indifferent to this title, as if this very recognition is but that small step taken from an endless journey that shaped him. These were the years of perseverance and that fervor with which he sought his art; it defines his success.

It was not given on a plate, but won with work, endless nights with the smell of paint, and the fight and testimony of canvases. It was one of his most important aims-not because he wanted recognition but because, in that time, membership was a passport to chances, the only possibility to pass into the big artistic world, to exhibit, meet other creators, and be acknowledged.

Yet, as he looks back, there is no overwhelming pride, no boastfulness toward this achievement. Rather, there is quiet acceptance of the fact, an interpretation of the paradox of his success: a time and place where talent was not enough-an artist had to find his niche in the rigid structures of the system. And that is precisely what Amiran did. Not out of love for the system, but because an artist had no other way out; his art, his truth to live by, his passion, his life-this membership in all its intricacies was a means to breathe life into this truth.

One reality he faces is the fact that, as time and history go by, it always appears to be one that is forwarded. Amiran was born, like so many of his generation, into the oppressive and confining world called the Soviet Union, which stifled freedom and ushered art toward the bosom of conformity. His birthplace was already a land of contrasts, and his fate was almost preordained. Another era, another place with other ideals, different freedoms-who can know how different Amiran's journey might have been? Had he been born in Rome at the height of the Roman Empire, perhaps he would have been feted as one of the greats leading that civilization's artistic union. However, it is fancies, probably had he been born in Mongolia in the powerful ruling of Genghis Khan, he could also have been the part of a group of the empire of the artists.

The cruel destiny took him to a country known as the Soviet Union-a union that during the period defined recognition, exhibition, and interaction of the then-current artists. For Amiran, it had never been about politics, nor the structure of the system, but rather about the chance to be seen, to be part of something greater, even though that something had been put in constraint by that very regime which controlled every part of them. To him, art had been the language of survival, and the Union was the only way to survive as an artist.

He boasted of being one of the few artists in the whole Union of Artists of the USSR who had never painted a portrait of Lenin.

An ironic thought, considering the only avenue to artistic expression in such a highly restrictive environment was through conformity. Part of the irony is an important constituent of Amiran's spirit: silent rebellion against the system, his art speaking louder than any title or membership ever would.

Nowadays Amirani is modernist, influenced by the vibrant colors of Post-Impressionism and the geometric fragmentation of early Cubism. The bold colors, fragmented forms, and dynamic compositions in his work clearly reflect his deep familiarity with early 20th-century European artistic movements. His paintings demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of color theory and structure.

Amirani's works serve both as cultural documents and creative interpretations of Georgian life, expressed through a refined mastery of modern artistic principles. His technical skills elevate the cultural themes in his paintings, making them both locally meaningful and universally resonant.

Technical Approach:

The artist employs a vibrant palette dominated by yellows, oranges, blues, and purples. His expressive and confident brushwork conveys a sense of movement and energy. Geometric fragmentation is often used to create dynamic compositions while preserving recognizable forms. Over decades of practice, he has refined his mastery of color and form through several distinctive techniques:

Color Palette:

  • Utilizes a signature palette of warm oranges and yellows paired with cool blues and purples.
  • Creates dramatic contrasts through strategic color placement.
  • Uses color not only descriptively but emotionally, conveying mood and atmosphere.
  • Demonstrates a particular skill in handling yellows and oranges as unifying elements across many works.

Brushwork and Texture:

  • Employs confident, decisive brushstrokes that evoke a sense of immediacy.
  • Varies brush techniques from broad, sweeping strokes to intricate linear elements.
  • Builds texture through layered paint and diverse application methods.
  • Uses visible brushwork to infuse compositions with energy and dynamism.

Composition:

  • Structures paintings using geometric principles while maintaining organic flow.
  • Creates dynamic tension through angular forms and intersecting planes.
  • Employs fragmentation of form to enhance rather than obscure the subject.
  • Shows a strong grasp of balance and visual weight in complex arrangements.

Cultural Context:

Amirani’s work deeply connects to Georgian culture, particularly through depictions of social scenes and musical performances reflecting local traditions. His architectural paintings often draw inspiration from the urban landscapes of Old Tbilisi.

His artwork blends Georgian cultural elements with broader artistic influences:

Local Traditions:

  • Illustrates traditional Georgian social gatherings and musical performances.
  • Captures café culture, a characteristic aspect of Georgian urban life.
  • Evokes the communal spirit of entertainment and celebration at the heart of Georgian culture.
  • References religious and spiritual themes through architectural symbolism.

Social Documentation:

  • Chronicles contemporary Georgian life through a modernist lens.
  • Explores the interplay between traditional and modern elements in Georgian society.
  • Highlights musicians and performers who help preserve cultural heritage.
  • Examines how public spaces serve as platforms for cultural expression and community gathering.

Architectural Elements:

  • Incorporates distinct Georgian architectural features in urban scenes.
  • Derives abstract compositions from local building styles and cityscapes.
  • Captures the essence of Georgian towns through attention to architectural details.
  • Explores how built environments shape social interaction within Georgian culture.

Modern Synthesis:

  • Merges Georgian cultural motifs with international modernist influences.
  • Develops a unique visual language that bridges local and global artistic traditions.
  • Balances cultural authenticity with contemporary artistic expression.
  • Reinterprets traditional subjects through modern artistic techniques.