Born on February 25, 1941, in Georgia, Amiran Parkosadze is an artist who represents a living link with modernist traditions while at the same time revealing his own unmistakable style. His works show technical mastery and emotional depth, especially in the depiction of human figures and social scenes.
![]() |
We do not even know how proud he must be, but the fact is the fact, and one couldn't retreat from it: Amiran Parkosadze became a member of the Union of Artists of the Soviet Union back in 1972.
![]() |
![]() |
When he begins to tell about the very start of his professional activity, the first thing striking is something grand, far exceeding the limits of any title and recognition. The membership of Amiran Parkosadze in the Union of Artists of the USSR in 1972 was not an achievement but a milestone event that over time came to express his unstoppable seeking of self-expression. It was the culmination of years spent perfecting his craft, pushing the boundaries of his abilities, and enduring the countless challenges that came with being an artist in a system that ordained the course which creative expression was to take.
Yes, he, as an artist, reached his goal and became a member of the Union of Artists of the USSR in 1972 --at that time when his endless years of struggle and sleepless nights with work just to fulfill his commitment were getting their consolation. Yet with all that, he remains the same-poor, almost indifferent to this title, as if this very recognition is but that small step taken from an endless journey that shaped him. These were the years of perseverance and that fervor with which he sought his art; it defines his success.
It was not given on a plate, but won with work, endless nights with the smell of paint, and the fight and testimony of canvases. It was one of his most important aims-not because he wanted recognition but because, in that time, membership was a passport to chances, the only possibility to pass into the big artistic world, to exhibit, meet other creators, and be acknowledged.
Yet, as he looks back, there is no overwhelming pride, no boastfulness toward this achievement. Rather, there is quiet acceptance of the fact, an interpretation of the paradox of his success: a time and place where talent was not enough-an artist had to find his niche in the rigid structures of the system. And that is precisely what Amiran did. Not out of love for the system, but because an artist had no other way out; his art, his truth to live by, his passion, his life-this membership in all its intricacies was a means to breathe life into this truth.
One reality he faces is the fact that, as time and history go by, it always appears to be one that is forwarded. Amiran was born, like so many of his generation, into the oppressive and confining world called the Soviet Union, which stifled freedom and ushered art toward the bosom of conformity. His birthplace was already a land of contrasts, and his fate was almost preordained. Another era, another place with other ideals, different freedoms-who can know how different Amiran's journey might have been? Had he been born in Rome at the height of the Roman Empire, perhaps he would have been feted as one of the greats leading that civilization's artistic union. However, it is fancies, probably had he been born in Mongolia in the powerful ruling of Genghis Khan, he could also have been the part of a group of the empire of the artists.
The cruel destiny took him to a country known as the Soviet Union-a union that during the period defined recognition, exhibition, and interaction of the then-current artists. For Amiran, it had never been about politics, nor the structure of the system, but rather about the chance to be seen, to be part of something greater, even though that something had been put in constraint by that very regime which controlled every part of them. To him, art had been the language of survival, and the Union was the only way to survive as an artist.
He boasted of being one of the few artists in the whole Union of Artists of the USSR who had never painted a portrait of Lenin.
An ironic thought, considering the only avenue to artistic expression in such a highly restrictive environment was through conformity. Part of the irony is an important constituent of Amiran's spirit: silent rebellion against the system, his art speaking louder than any title or membership ever would.
Nowadays Amirani is modernist, influenced by the vibrant colors of Post-Impressionism and the geometric fragmentation of early Cubism. The bold colors, fragmented forms, and dynamic compositions in his work clearly reflect his deep familiarity with early 20th-century European artistic movements. His paintings demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of color theory and structure.
Amirani's works serve both as cultural documents and creative interpretations of Georgian life, expressed through a refined mastery of modern artistic principles. His technical skills elevate the cultural themes in his paintings, making them both locally meaningful and universally resonant.
The artist employs a vibrant palette dominated by yellows, oranges, blues, and purples. His expressive and confident brushwork conveys a sense of movement and energy. Geometric fragmentation is often used to create dynamic compositions while preserving recognizable forms. Over decades of practice, he has refined his mastery of color and form through several distinctive techniques:
Color Palette:
Brushwork and Texture:
Composition:
Amirani’s work deeply connects to Georgian culture, particularly through depictions of social scenes and musical performances reflecting local traditions. His architectural paintings often draw inspiration from the urban landscapes of Old Tbilisi.
His artwork blends Georgian cultural elements with broader artistic influences:
Local Traditions:
Social Documentation:
Architectural Elements:
Modern Synthesis: